Reading someone's top 100 "prospect" list and gets me fired up, I guess controversy sells, but anyway.
If it is a "prospect" list, how do you have players with D2 or zero offers ranked multiple spots above players with multiple FBS offers? If it was a "best player" list, I can see this happening.
Reporters should report, if you haven't played or at least coached, don't try and rank players.
That is like me ranking the best coffee and I don't drink it. Or a vegan ranking the best burger. Doesn't make sense.