The "logic" behind the comment is that a player at a school not known as a football powerhouse had his statistics inflated by the lack of quality opponents his team faced. Because of this theory, there are players every year who are dubbed a "surprise," a guy who's production at the NFL level exceeds that expected of a player not drafted in the first round.
That makes sense -- if a player didn't play against top-flight
competition in a major conference, he has no chance of NFL success,
If there's any doubt about the lunacy of this statement, check out the
pro résumés of Walter Payton and Jerry Rice. The greatest rusher and
receiver in NFL history played their college ball at Jackson State and
Mississippi Valley State, respectively -- not exactly Michigan and
There are some NFL personnel executives who will choose to take a
productive player from a high-profile college team over any
small-school star, regardless of how big or strong or fast or
productive the small-school player is. Others will reach for a player
from a low-profile school, touting the player's physical attributes and
production, perhaps in the private hope of becoming the scouting genius
who sees the talent in a player that other scouts overlooked. Some will
bypass a player who clearly has professional ability in the hopes of
mining a diamond. Others will eschew small-school talent, taking the
"safe" approach by going for a big-name player from a big-name school,
even if the ability and production just isn't there.
The question here, of course, is: will the Cowboys dip into the
small-school pool in this year's draft? Or will they stick only to
players from high-profile football factories?
Jerry Jones has a history of grabbing high-profile college stars like
Emmitt Smith (Florida) and Michael Irvin (Miami), as well as
small-school players, such as Kavika Pittman of McNeese State. But to
be fair, so does head coach Bill Parcells, who drafted small-school
stars such as Phil Simms (Morehead State) and Wayne Chrebet (Hofstra)
between big-school names like Drew Bledsoe (Washington State) and
Willie McGinest (USC).
To illustrate the options available this year, consider a pair of wide
receivers. Granted, Dallas is not expected to take a receiver in the
first round (most prognosticators have the Cowboys taking defensive
players with each of their two selections in the first round) but the
choice -- if not the answer -- is evident.
One of the hot names in this year's pre-draft speculation is that of
Arkansas quarterback Matt Jones, who is expected to move to receiver in
the NFL. At 6-foot-6 and 240 pounds, Jones is enormous for a receiver,
and couples that size with freakish athleticism: having run sub-4.4s in
the 40-yard dash and displaying his all-around athletic ability as a
member of the Arkansas basketball team.
Vincent Jackson looks a lot like Jones as a prospect. He's a 6-foot-5,
238-pound receiver who is hailed for his athleticism. He has good speed
and athleticism, not to mention good hands. Like Jones, Jackson
also is a former basketball player. And unlike Jones, who will be
learning a new position, Jackson dominated in his college games.
So what's the difference?
The theory is that as an always-improvising QB against some of the best
athletes in the nation, on the gridiron and the hardwood, Jones must
have the ability to switch positions as a professional player. Some
team is going to bet a large signing bonus and signing bonus on that
assessment, as Jones is expected to hear his name called in the second
round -- or maybe even the first. Jackson, on the other hand, beat up
on the competition while playing at Northern Colorado -- an independent
school awaiting acceptance into the .... Big Sky Conference.
Drafting college players, like the college recruiting of high school
players, is a very inexact science.
Teams do extraordinary amounts of
testing, film evaluation, interviewing and even background checks on
players, knowing that they are facing an immense investment in the
game's top new players. Considering the fact that he played a different
position in college, pro scouts really don't know what they're getting
in Jones. At the same time, Jackson was an extremely productive college
receiver, and his athletic measurements and tests are very similar. Is
the difference in schools (and therefore competition) the only reason
for the anticipated two-round gap between the two? Put it this way: if
Jones was playing at Northern Colorado and Jackson was playing at
Arkansas, would Jones still be rated two rounds ahead of Jackson? Not
Besides, Parcells and Jones remain open to the idea of drafting from
small schools (see Northwestern Oklahoma WR Patrick Crayton, who was
taken by Dallas in last year's draft). The willingness to do so often
goes in cycles; if a team is burned repeatedly on small-school "reach"
players, that team likely will stick to taking players from the
nation's larger programs. Whether the Cowboys will repeat the practice
will be determined this weekend.
Small School vs. Big School- Does Size Matter?
CowboysHQ Top Stories
A Cowboys Thank-You Note To Tony RomoOne Appreciative Man's Dallas Cowboys 'Thank-You' Note To Tony Romo
Garrett On Cowboys: Farewell, Future, F-BombJason Garrett's Cowboys Season-Closing Press Conference: A Farewell, A Future, An F-Bomb.
CowboysHQYesterday at 5:15 PM
Identity Lost: Who Were These Cowboys?The Dallas Cowboys have been a run-first team all season. But on Sunday against Green Bay the Cowboys turned their back on their identity enough to lose.
CowboysHQYesterday at 11:33 AM
Titletown Tops Entitled Town: Cowboys Advice'Titletown' Tops 'Entitled Town' - Packers, Dallas, And The Cowboys Playoff Ouster Column You Don't Want To Read
CowboysHQYesterday at 5:33 AM