Me, for one. And I remember writing how that game showed me as much, if not more, than the previous wins. Why? The 49ers were a Super Bowl contender and the Redskins slugged it out with them, losing a close game.
Then they collapsed. And they didn't make the playoffs.
So here we go again: Sunday's loss at Denver revealed an awful lot about the
Redskins. I'm not going to get carried away and proclaim it anything other than
a close loss, a game they really should have won.
It's doubtful anyone with the Redskins walked away feeling as if the better team
won. Washington clearly had numerous opportunities to win and outgained Denver
by 190 yards. Bad teams don't pile up as much yardage as the Redskins did.
But winning is what matters. After missing out on the playoffs since 1999, good
losses don't count. However, there's plenty of good to take out of such defeats.
The Redskins' offense is starting to look good and for the third straight game
they scored on their final drive. This time, a tipped two-point conversion
prevented a tie. But here's the point: they drove 94 yards -- 94-- on the road,
in the rain, against a good defense.
Problem is, the Redskins still make too many mistakes to win games like this.
That's a shame. If they can figure out a way to eliminate the costly penalties,
turnovers and special teams lapses, they have a chance for a good season.
The safety: The Redskins obviously didn't like the call. And it's an odd rule
because Jake Plummer clearly had aborted any desire to pass. So it should be a
fumble, right? Well, not quite. If they have the Tuck Rule, then this is when it
needs to be applied. Plummer had to reset with the ball before it could have
been ruled a fumble. Does this rule make sense? Not always; this is one of those
Offensive star: The line did an excellent job against the sturdy Denver front
four.They opened holes for the running game, paving the way for Clinton Portis
to rush for more than 100 yards. And they allowed no sacks in 53 pass attempts.
There was some pressure, but that's to be expected. Give them credit; they
deserved it after this one.
Special mention: Chris Cooley, who caught eight passes. The Redskins have split
him out in the past, but they did so even more this game and it worked. He often
found himself in solo coverage against smaller defenders, allowing him to, in
essence, become the big receiver Washington lacks. Also, Mark Brunell did a
masterful job handling the elements; it rained all day yet he rarely struggled
with his throws. Games like this provide hope for the rest of the season. And
receiver Santana Moss had eight catches for 116 yards, a strong day. Funny, the
Denver papers talked about how they contained him.
Defensive star: Not sure any one player stood out. But we'll go with corner
Carlos Rogers. He covered Rod Smith most of the game, even rotating sides to
cover him when Shawn Springs was in the game. Rogers responded well. Yes, he bit
on one out-and-up, but it didn't hurt the Redskins. And Rogers again was
physical in the run game. The more I see, the more I like.
Good to see: The offensive production. Washington had no trouble running or
throwing against Denver, showing the kind of balance Joe Gibbs loves. Funny to
say that given that Mark Brunell attempted 53 passes. But that stemmed as much
from how much they had the ball because they still ran well. And, against
Denver, the way to open things up is to prove you can pass, then run the ball.
It's what the Redskins did. Very smart. And it nearly worked.
Bad to see: More critical errors by the special teams. They look good most of
the game, then they commit penalties at the worst time (Mike Sellers on the
54-yard successful field goal, removing three critical points) and the blocked
field goal. OK, they blocked a punt and covered well. But they need more
consistency. In tight games, you can't commit these mistakes.
Trade winds: It certainly appears the Broncos made out for the better in the
Portis-Bailey trade, thanks in large part to Tatum Bell, who scored on touchdown
runs of 34 and 55 yards. Denver does not miss Portis one bit. Then again, the
Redskins have fared well without Pro Bowl corner Champ Bailey. But Denver got
two players who could help in this deal; Washington got one. That said, Portis
again showed that he's a complete back, the way he picks up blitzes and one time
dropped Al Wilson with a hard block. Portis has matured since his Denver days,
when coaches questioned his commitment and maturity.
Curious decision: Not to play LaVar Arrington. The defensive strength has been
playing assignments and not allowing long runs. Well, that broke down in this
game and the linebackers didn't exactly have good games. Of course, maybe the
coaches will say Arrington was standing out of place on the sidelines and that
led to the big runs. We joke, of course. But the point is, Arrington could have
made a difference in this game. Those who have replaced him, Warrick Holdman and
Chris Clemons, did not. Really, it's unbelievable that Clemons is playing ahead
of Arrington as a rush end.
Turnover ratio: The Redskins once more finished in the negative for the fourth
straight game in the takeaway-giveaway ratio. This defense, which is supposed to
bring lots of pressure, does not make big plays. Teams have avoided throwing in
Sean Taylor's area and no one up front makes big plays. Good as Marcus Washington has been, he's a playstopper and not a playmaker. And this offense,
which is becoming productive, needs more short fields to operate to have a
Defensive lapses: Bell broke free on a fourth and one when end Phillip Daniels
failed to stop him in the backfield. Also, linebacker Warrick Holdman was slow
filling the hole, allowing Bell to score from 34 yards out. Later in the game,
Ryan Clark blitzed from the left side of Denver's line. So what did the Broncos
do? They ran the other way, with Bell going around the right end for a 55-yard
score, with only safety Matt Bowen having a good attempt at him. But he missed
on a diving tackle attempt.
Redskins 19, Broncos 21
Breaking Burgundy Top Stories
Rookie Matchups: Week 1 Eagles-RedskinsThe Eagles three picks on the first two days were on defense, but one of them is not too interesting.
Breaking BurgundyYesterday at 12:00 PM
Fact or Fiction: Redskins offense dropoff?The Breaking Burgundy team gives their prediction on the Washington Redskins upcoming season.
Breaking BurgundyYesterday at 5:00 AM
Top Redskins Heading Into Make Or Break 2017Contract years are big time motivators.
Breaking BurgundyFriday at 5:00 AM
'91 Redskins Crowned Best Team EverThe Washington Redskins have not won a Super Bowl in nearly 30 years, but their legendary teams of the past have been brought up in this discussion; Who is the best team to ever…
Breaking BurgundyFriday at 12:45 AM