Jackson drama could be sign of CBA times

The very public Vincent Jackson saga oozed angst and anger from several angles, but it might just be the first in a series of player vs. team dramas over the next year. The lack of a long-term Collective Bargaining Agreement could produce more venom.

The Vincent Jackson saga came and went … for now.

In what has turned into a metaphorical line in the sand between a player and ownership – Jackson vs. the San Diego Chargers – the initial (see below) deadline in the opportunity for the Chargers to trade Jackson came and went. Had that team been the Vikings, he would have been available for the Oct. 17 game vs. Dallas Cowboys. Perhaps more importantly, he would have been available the following week when the Vikings make their 2010 trip to Lambeau Field. That opportunity is dead.

Unfortunately, it would seem this impasse may be the first shot across the bow in the egg shell-walking future of the NFL. Jackson has five years in the NFL and was preparing for a big pay day as a free agent. That chance was denied when the current Collective Bargaining Agreement collapsed. More than 200 players were going to be harnessed when their unfortunate place in NFL history deprived them of their right to be paid on the open market as unrestricted free agents, instead settling for the confines of restricted free agency in 2010.

Most other players afflicted with the same situation took the same approach – hope the free-agent market would find bidders, skip the offseason workout program and, prior to training camp, sign the tender and play. Ray Edwards is no less angry than Jackson over the situation. Jackson took a stand and said "no" – despite getting the largest possible tender he could get.

What makes the impasse a bit darker is that, when it became clear that Jackson was serious about maintaining his holdout, he and his agent were given permission to work out a trade with another team. According to the story as it has developed, Jackson's agent and an unnamed team – named by several sources as being the Vikings – had worked out an amicable deal. Many believed it was a one-year deal with a potential option to it that would likely make Jackson, a six-year veteran by season's end, an unrestricted free agent in 2011. The problem? The Chargers apparently had no intention of trading Jackson unless they were allowed to squeeze the trigger of the gun at the temple of a desperate organization. The Vikings seemed to be that team. When the Vikings refused to pay the ransom being demanded (said to be second- and third-round draft picks in 2011), the gun clicked and nothing happened.

In the aftermath, his agent dropped the classic line referring to San Diego general manager A.J. Smith as "The Lord of No Rings" – raising the bar of agent rhetoric. More troubling were text messages sent to NFL.com by Jackson saying he felt betrayed by the team.

"I can't understand why," Jackson said of the trade not being finalized. "They (the Chargers) obviously think I'm a valuable player by asking such high trade compensation, but why am I offered tender salary? My agents and teams interested did everything to make it happen, but this organization stopped it. I just want to play football. It feels unethical and I am disappointed."

While the vitriol is directed at Smith and the Chargers organization, the message is being sent to players league-wide that, under the current system, the owners can prove that they own the hammer. At best, the Chargers have claimed that Jackson should have been worth the compensation commensurate with what Denver got for Brandon Marshall – a second- and third-round draft pick. The flaw in that logic is that Miami gave up that bounty prior to the draft. Marshall was given the long-term contract he sought and he went through all the offseason workout programs with the team and was eligible for every game this year. Jackson would be showing up with 25 percent of the season in the rearview mirror. The two weren't even close to being comparable, but the Chargers seem to be living by their own set of rules.

What will be interesting now, much in the same way the news of Brett Favre's retirement didn't pan out, the candles being blown out at 3:01 p.m. Wednesday aren't the end of the Jackson saga. The backlash against Smith and the Chargers seems clear. What will Jackson be worth in two weeks? You can bet one thing. It still won't be a second- and third-round pick and, given the animosity that has boiled over, it may be much more of a buyer's market that it was the first time around. The question is whether San Diego will ever be willing to sell.


  • The Vikings wide receiver dilemma got even worse when it was reported that not only is Percy Harvin sidelined with another bout of migraines, Bernard Berrian has a knee problem.

  • From the "Stop With the Kicking" Department comes this: On ESPN Sports Nation, fans get to rate the head coaches of the teams they follow. Big shocker! Saints fans love Sean Payton. He leads all coaches with a 93 percent approval rating. Mildly lesser shocker! Packers fans love Mike McCarthy. The green Kool-Aid is going down easy and Mayor McCheese is getting a 91 percent approval rating. Shockingly, 0-2 Lions coach Jim Schwartz has an 85 percent approval rating. What has Raheem Morris done wrong? Lightning has struck the hapless Bucs twice, yet he has just a 77 percent approval rating. No Roethlisberger, no problem. Or is there? The Steelers are 2-0 with the circus carousel at quarterback, yet just 73 percent of those identifying themselves as Steelers fans – they're everywhere – approve of Mike Tomlin. The Bears are 2-0, but where's the Lovie love? Lovie Smith is getting just a 68-percent approval rating from those identifying themselves as fans of Da Bears. The venom from fans continued to grow as the list went down. When Big Wade Phillips clocked in at 11 percent, there was only one coach missing. Vikings fans gave their own Chilly recipe and it was brutal. Childress got an 8 percent rating. OK, there are a couple of Chilly haters out there. Oh, wait a minute. There were 991 votes cast for Childress. That was 50 percent more than the next-highest vote total (Tomlin's tepid result with 679 votes). Only New Orleans and Dallas had more than 500 votes. Even the Packers sycophants could only muster 468 votes. The most apathetic fans are in Arizona and St. Louis with 109 and 111, respectively. Not only are the Internet log-in types angry with the Vikes, they're angry in numbers.

  • Viking Update Top Stories