The Minnesota Supreme Court gave the sides in a Vikings stadium funding lawsuit until Thursday to answer two key questions, opting against immediate dismissal of a case that has tied up money needed for construction.
In an order Tuesday, the high court said it wants clarity on whether justices have jurisdiction to intervene and whether people seeking to stop the stadium's construction have grounds to do so. Justice Alan Page, a former NFL player, recused himself in the initial ruling.
The court didn't say if it will call a full hearing into the lawsuit, which has already led state officials to postpone a $468 million bond sale. Stadium authority officials warn a drawn-out process could lead to crippling delays.
A former Minneapolis mayoral candidate and two other people sued late last week, saying the funding plan was unconstitutional.
The state agency that was set to sell public bonds said in a legal filing earlier Tuesday that the lawsuit was flawed.
Department of Minnesota Management and Budget lawyers pressed the state Supreme Court to dismiss the case. It was filed Friday, a few days before a scheduled bond sale was to occur. The lawyers argue the lawsuit has cast a "material cloud" in the minds of investors and needs to be resolved quickly.
"The existence of an unresolved lawsuit challenging the constitutionality of a pending bond issue not only disrupts the timing of a bond sale and closing, but also creates an investment risk that translates to reduced market demand and higher interest costs for the state," lawyer Thomas Klosowski wrote in the brief.
Former Minneapolis mayoral candidate Doug Mann and two others are arguing that the stadium financing arrangements were designed to circumvent a city charter provision that would have triggered a referendum. The stadium funding plan splits construction costs for the $1 billion facility between the team and the public.
Officials overseeing the stadium's construction in Minneapolis warn a prolonged delay could leave bills unpaid and push out a planned summer 2016 opening.
As part of the state's filing, it has asked that the plaintiffs post a $50 million bond to cover potential damages from delays if they don't prevail in their case.
Follow Viking Update on Twitter and discuss this topic on our message boards. To become a subscriber to the Viking Update web site or magazine, click here.
MN court wants more info on stadium bond sale
Viking Update Top Stories
Assessing the metrics for Vikings RBsIn a season that saw the offensive line in flux, the running backs were rotating liberally with each of them displaying different strengths, as the net yards over average, grades…
Viking Update8:33 AM
Podcast: Outside free agents, Sunday reviewWith the Super Bowl teams set, we review the conference championship games and look at some of the potential free agents for the Minnesota Vikings to pursue.
Viking Update6:43 AM
McKinnon unsure of what's coming for offenseThere are numerous questions surrounding the makeup of the 2017 Minnesota Vikings offense. Running back Jerick McKinnon will be part of it. What will his role be? He doesn't know,…
Viking Update5:52 AM
Barr named to Pro Bowl as replacementThe Minnesota Vikings now have six players in the Pro Bowl after LB Anthony Barr was named a replacement on Monday.
Viking UpdateYesterday at 7:46 AM